And have we found any secular proof for 607 yet scholar???
City Fan
JoinedPosts by City Fan
-
125
Making 607 crumble
by ellderwho induring my eight month long study with "elder bob" (moms husband) we have batted around many subjects to say the least.
but the one that really stands out is the dreaded date of 607 bc.
im sorry i just will not let up with this date, and him having to prove it can stand.
-
-
29
666 or 616??
by metatron inlast night, on the discovery channel, they interviewed a researcher who analyzed a scrap of papyrus that recorded revelation.. he contended that the critical passage of the "number of the beast" actually read 616 in greek, not 666. he tried to apply.
this to caligula thru numerology.. i had never heard of this variant reading before.. .
metatron
-
City Fan
I may add to my post when I get back from my football charity dinner.
-
29
666 or 616??
by metatron inlast night, on the discovery channel, they interviewed a researcher who analyzed a scrap of papyrus that recorded revelation.. he contended that the critical passage of the "number of the beast" actually read 616 in greek, not 666. he tried to apply.
this to caligula thru numerology.. i had never heard of this variant reading before.. .
metatron
-
City Fan
The Hebrew spelling of Nero Caesar was NRWN QSR. Gematria was used to represent letters as numbers and NRWN QSR = 666
Nero Caesar transliterated from Latin gives a gematria number of 616, so a Hebrew spelling gives 666 and a Latin spelling gives 616.
I've never seen it used to describe Caligula, the 666/616 variant is proof that the number referred to Nero.
-
125
Making 607 crumble
by ellderwho induring my eight month long study with "elder bob" (moms husband) we have batted around many subjects to say the least.
but the one that really stands out is the dreaded date of 607 bc.
im sorry i just will not let up with this date, and him having to prove it can stand.
-
City Fan
Scholar,
No you haven't. You've provided one piece of secular evidence for 539, and then biblical evidence (based on biblical interpretation) for 607.
You said there was plenty of secular evidence for 607 and I'm still waiting for an example.
For example, is there any secular evidence that allows for the fall of Jerusalem to have occurred in 607 BCE?
CF.
-
125
Making 607 crumble
by ellderwho induring my eight month long study with "elder bob" (moms husband) we have batted around many subjects to say the least.
but the one that really stands out is the dreaded date of 607 bc.
im sorry i just will not let up with this date, and him having to prove it can stand.
-
City Fan
Scholar
You did state there was abundant secular evidence for 607.
I just want one example.
-
125
Making 607 crumble
by ellderwho induring my eight month long study with "elder bob" (moms husband) we have batted around many subjects to say the least.
but the one that really stands out is the dreaded date of 607 bc.
im sorry i just will not let up with this date, and him having to prove it can stand.
-
City Fan
Scholar, your answer was:
You ask for ONE piece of secular evidence to support 607. No problem. The calculation begins with the pivotal date of 539 which is accepted by scholarship to mark the conquest of Babylon. proof of this is established by the Nabonidus Chronicle now located in the British Museum.This clay tablet is a well dated record of the Fall of Babylon which yields the date as October 5 Gregorian or October 11, Julian.
You've given me one piece of SECULAR evidence for 539, the Nabonidus Chronicle.
I asked for one piece of secular evidence for 607.
You would also need other secular sources to get the 539BC date for the fall of Babylon e.g. Diodorus giving Cyrus' last year as Olympiad 62.1 or astronomical text Strm. Kambys. 400.
Once again please name one piece of secular evidence to support 607.
CF.
-
13
Who was the author of Revelation?
by worldlygirl ini was watching a program on the history channel the other night and it was mentioned that the author of the book of revelation is not known.
it is thought to be "john" but they said it could have either been john the baptist, the apostle john, or maybe a completely different "john.
what is the org's view?
-
City Fan
Good article Pete.
This part fits in with some of my recent research:
it is necessary to bear in mind that since the days of Pompey Rome was in the eyes of the Jewish apocalyptic writers the fourth beast in the Daniel apocalypse (see Dan. vii. 7), the last "wicked kingdom" whose end is to usher in the Messianic kingdom
This fourth beast was originally viewed as Greece and so when the end didn't arrive the Jewish apocalyptic writers re-assigned the identity of this beast to Rome. The end didn't happen then either and so the beast has continually been re-assigned identities up until the present day.
-
125
Making 607 crumble
by ellderwho induring my eight month long study with "elder bob" (moms husband) we have batted around many subjects to say the least.
but the one that really stands out is the dreaded date of 607 bc.
im sorry i just will not let up with this date, and him having to prove it can stand.
-
City Fan
Scholar
I'm still waiting, can you provide just one piece of secular evidence for 607.
CF.
-
32
Evidence that populations descended from the 16 grandsons of Noah
by hooberus in.
secular history gives much evidence to show that the survivors of noah?s flood were real historical figures, whose names were indelibly carved on much of the ancient world ?
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/4215cen_s1998.asp
-
City Fan
Or maybe the writers and redactors of these myths chose names for Noah's grandsons that were the same as nations that existed at the time??
Come on Hooberus, that article is pure drivel.
-
125
Making 607 crumble
by ellderwho induring my eight month long study with "elder bob" (moms husband) we have batted around many subjects to say the least.
but the one that really stands out is the dreaded date of 607 bc.
im sorry i just will not let up with this date, and him having to prove it can stand.
-
City Fan
Scholar,
Can you name ONE piece of secular evidence to support 607.
CF.